A
local “Occupy” began in the small Southern city I live in. The
folks who started it were from a student environmental group—the
closest thing to an activist group on the local campus—and were
joined by professors and community activists. At the first meeting I
attended, someone asked: “Does anyone want to set-up an encampment
somewhere?” there was silence followed by a bevy of reasons from
individuals why they couldn't participate in it (thus, implying they
would like to, but just
couldn't). The new
group of “occupiers without intent to occupy” debated the
legality of a sidewalk march, looked into acquiring a permit, and
even announced their route to police (who sent a bike-cop to the
march). The occupiers were a remarkably self-disciplining group. I
was very curious to see what all this would lead to.
The
event itself inspired youthful, first-time participants, as well as
elders, who expressed excitement at the number of protesters. The
turn-out was relatively large, due to the influence of “bigger
cities”; people had heard about #OWS in NYC and elsewhere. Very
positive media coverage resulted, just as with lead-up coverage to
the protest. (Very little activism takes place here and there's
usually a direct regurgitation of talking-points by the media.)
Attendees were a mixture of optimistic, excited newcomers and
battle-scarred, cynical political veterans. People vented righteous
rage, but afterward did not know how to translate it into long-term
struggle. Some of us inserted some class-war flavor, including a “you
are the 1%” line into the liberal, repetitive “we are the 99%”
chants as we approached a Bank of America branch. The chant went
great, and was the event's most intense and exciting moments. But,
ultimately, the town's “Occupy” was just that: a one-time protest
event, not a movement.
As
always, multiple factors contribute to an outcome. In this case,
certain things prevented the movement from moving forward, growing,
and gaining militancy. First, low trust, experience, and stable
residency existed amongst those active with Occupy. The town’s
small activist “pond” caused problems: activists must interact
with a small number of fellow activists who do not get along. Thus,
many interested people stayed-away from Occupy due to personality
conflicts. Debates between seasoned activists, who share long
histories, drowned-out other voices. Like many other Occupy groups,
this one includes Democrat partisans who—in the country's most
conservative region—position themselves as the local radicals.
FaceBook served as a safe “place” for trading information. But,
if online “activism” is the extent of a community's collective
experience, translating talk into real-world action is difficult.
The
local university, the most progressive zone in the small city, is
also the site of a restrictive “free speech” policy, vindictive
administrators, and a transient student population. The town itself
has a history of political repression (including being adjacent to
the historic “lynching capital” of the US), a small number of
incredibly large land-owners, and crony politicians. Finally,
conservative Christianity not only provides the theoretical framework
for most people's lives, but also tends to numb people's sense of
self-empowerment from collective acts of resistance.
The
biggest challenge to the city's attempt at Occupy involved the lack
of activist or progressive infrastructure, critical-mass, or inertia.
Yes, culture can change, but it often takes long years of organizing.
People do what they know or what they think others are doing—thus
if little radicalism or reference to radical ideas exists, where are
people to gain experience with radical action? Radical ideas (e.g.
occupations, GAs, direct democracy, consensus) can get watered down
due to misunderstanding, lack of experience, timidity, a “that
wouldn't work here” attitude, a less politically-adversarial
culture, and people refusing to work with others. The challenge
remaining: introducing more folks in small cities to radical ideas
(of praxis, strategy, tactics). It's possible—and I hope—that
Occupy can still help satisfy this need.
No comments:
Post a Comment