[Written in 2004 during a particularly inspired moment of repulsion.]
Somewhere between the benign “what would
        Jesus do?” (WWJD?) crowd and goose-stepping
        fascists, are those who call themselves the “religious
        Right”... as if there were anything “right”
        about it, except its political orientation. These folks
        seem to think that the laws of religion are as flexible
        as the laws of gravity are to Jackie Chan movies or
        “The Matrix”. They utilize all sorts of
        religious passages, sayings, psalms, and teachings to
        suit their own individualistic (and sick, in my opinion)
        purposes.
For example, a former adviser to “President”
        Bush was on the radio tonight speaking about her “faith”.
        She responded to a question asking whether it was okay
        for the “President” to constantly invoke “God”
        and his faith in public speeches, even though many are
        not religious, while others are not Christian (the radio
        host didn't bother adding that even some Christians could
        do without a clown like Bush mouthing off). She stated
        that “our faith” (as in, her and the “President”)
        helps to put the country at ease during these “hard
        times”, and that it's good for Bush to talk about
        being humble, forgiving, and turning the other cheek (I
        know, I know!! I'm not making this up!!)
The religious Right selectively uses this rhetoric
        when it's convenient. For instance, it's all fine and
        dandy for Bush to preach forgiveness towards his errors,
        but there's only fire-and-brimstone for the millions of
        innocent Afghanis that he wrecked his flimsy will upon
        during that country's bombardment. Turning the other
        cheek? Hah, that's what Bush demanded of Afghanistan:
        turn your head so we can smack the other side now, too!
Far be it from me to lecture Bush on Christ, someone
        who (if the Bible is accurate) was undoubtedly a radical
        who was murdered by the State for his charismatic ability
        to lead a social movement against the Roman Empire (and
        corrupt Jewish tribal leaders). Surely Bush is aware that
        Christ would have resisted any aggressive despot that
        invades other countries, and that “turning the cheek”
        is not just convenient rhetoric to toss about to persuade
        others of your humanity.
The furor caused by “The Passion of the Christ”,
        the movie by Mel Gibson, only illustrates the rabidity of
        the religious Right to latch onto whatever medium and
        means it can to further pervert Christianity. Sure,
        “the passion” is only the last day of Jesus's
        life, a day allegedly filled with unspeakable brutality.
        But, why must one stomach long minutes of such torture on
        the silver screen? Aren't there more important messages
        to draw from the legacy of Christ? It's almost as if
        Gibson and the Right wants to martyr Jesus not in order
        to obtain a higher plane of morality, but to justify
        retribution for their savior's untimely demise.
In fact, the only “Jesus Freaks” who I can
        bear, are the Catholic Workers, who may or may not take
        offense to such characterization. But, I mean it in the
        most loving way: here are people who have taken the
        actual meaning of Jesus to heart, and live it day and day
        out. They live in poverty, sharing their homes and lives
        with the least fortunate of society. They speak out
        against violence, injustice, poverty, apathy, and moral
        self-righteousness. Nothing has infused me with a renewed
        sense of hope for the future of Christianity than hearing
        about Workers chastising their Bishop for not taking a
        stronger stance against the US war on Iraq, who instead
        hid behind the Church's “just war theory”.
Unlike Bush's adviser and Bush himself, the Workers do
        not feel themselves above literal meanings. As the Bible
        notes, the hypocrite is one who does not apply to
        him/herself standards that they demand of others. Thus if
        one act of violence against innocents is wrong, than all
        other acts of violence against the innocent is also
        wrong. Of course this makes perfect sense, but the Bush
        Mob and the Right realizes that organized religion, like
        all other tools of control, may be wielded over others
        only if the rules don't apply to them. Otherwise they
        couldn't justify even owning a military or police or
        prisons, let alone use them to bomb, invade, arrest, or
        incarcerate millions!
Whenever I hear Bush say “god bless you”
        after a speech, my mind visualizes his nose growing like
        Pinocchio. I imagine him crossing his fingers under the
        podium. I think of his inner-dialogue saying: “haha,
        suckers!!”. His language is a tool of control just
        as his “faith” is a self-delusion. Anyone can
        realize that playing favorites, especially with a jerk
        like Bush, is not in any god's best interest.
Further, why would a god (at least a kind and just
        one) advocate the assassination of doctors, the execution
        of the poor on death row (when was the last time a rich
        man was executed?), invasions and crusades, censorship,
        patriarchy and sexism, slavery, compulsory and
        officialized religion and prayer, or the consolidation of
        political and economic power? Why does the Right demand
        that “intelligent design” (code for “creationism”)
        be taught in secular schools? Why does the Right root and
        cheer for Israel's crimes against the Palestinian people,
        while simultaneously adhering to grotesque antisemitism?
        Why does the Right cry bloody murder when people protest
        clearly religious symbols and endorsements like the Ten
        Commandments in courthouses and “In God We Trust”
        on our money and Pledge of Allegiance? Why does the Right
        advocate “celibacy” while it is clear that such
        teaching does not work? Why does the Right condemn women
        for choosing to have children or not, but then say “too
        bad for you” when children are born into poverty?
The same forked-tongue is everywhere-- Jesus told me
        to do this: “He told me to bomb this or that
        country! He told me to kill that abortion doctor! He told
        me to molest those parishioners! He told me to keep my
        wife in her place! Blah blah blah!”
Then, they turn around, as Mumia Abu-Jamal notes, in
        the US's celebration of “MLK Day”: “Imagine
        the most violent nation on earth, the heir of Indian and
        African genocide, the only nation ever to drop an atomic
        bomb on a civilian population, the world's biggest arms
        dealer, the country that napaled over ten million people
        in Vietnam (to “save” it from communism), the
        world's biggest jailer, waving the corpse of King,
        calling for nonviolence!” Talk is cheap, when it
        dribbles out of the mouths of powerful elites.
Let's recognize this for what it is: hypocrisy.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment